Home › Physics › Electricity and Magnetism › Diamagnetism
Electricity and Magnetism
Diamagnetism
Diamagnetism is a fundamental magnetic property exhibited by all materials in which induced magnetic moments oppose the applied magnetic field. It originates from the modification of orbital motion of atomic electrons under an external magnetic field according to Lenz's law.
UP TGT ScienceUP PGT PhysicsStudy Notes + Practice
Scope and prerequisites
TGT core
Definition of diamagnetic substances, negative and small magnetic susceptibility, relative permeability slightly less than one, independence of temperature (Curie-Weiss law non-applicability), and qualitative behavior in non-uniform magnetic fields (repulsion from stronger to weaker regions).
PGT extension
Langevin's classical theory of diamagnetism, derivation of diamagnetic susceptibility using Larmor precession frequency, temperature independence proof, and quantitative calculations involving atomic number and mean square radius of electron orbits.
Prerequisites
Atomic structure and electron orbital motion
Electromagnetic induction and Lenz's law
Magnetic field intensity, magnetization, and magnetic susceptibility definitions
Origin of Diamagnetism
Every material possesses diamagnetism because all atoms contain orbiting electrons that constitute microscopic current loops.
When an external magnetic field is applied, it induces an electromotive force via Faraday's law of induction.
According to Lenz's law, the induced current creates a magnetic moment that opposes the applied external magnetic field.
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
Diamagnetic materials have a small and negative magnetic susceptibility (χ), typically on the order of 10-5 to 10-9.
The relative magnetic permeability (μr = 1 + χ) is slightly less than unity.
The magnetic permeability (μ) of a diamagnetic substance is less than the permeability of free space (μ0).
Temperature Independence
Unlike paramagnetism and ferromagnetism, diamagnetic susceptibility is independent of absolute temperature (T).
Thermal agitation does not disrupt the induced atomic currents because the induced magnetic moment is a direct dynamical response to the external field rather than an alignment of permanent dipoles.
Exceptions occur only in certain semimetals or superconductors where structural phase changes alter carrier density with temperature.
Behavior in Magnetic Fields
When placed in a non-uniform magnetic field, diamagnetic materials move from regions of stronger magnetic field to regions of weaker magnetic field.
A freely suspended diamagnetic rod aligns itself perpendicular to the direction of a uniform magnetic field.
Superconductors exhibit perfect diamagnetism (Meissner effect), expelling all magnetic flux completely with $\chi = -1$.
Derivations
Langevin Theory of Diamagnetism
Conditions: Spherical charge distribution of Z electrons per atom, weak external magnetic field B
An electron of charge -e and mass m moving in a circular orbit of radius r experiences a change in angular frequency Δω equal to the Larmor frequency given by Δ$\omega = \frac{eB}{2m}$.
This change in frequency induces an additional circular current $i = -\frac{e Deltaomega}{2pi} = -\frac{e^2 B}{4pi m}$.
The induced magnetic moment μind for a single electron orbit of area $A = \pi\langle r^{2} \rangle$ is given by μind = i $A = -\frac{e^2 B}{4pi m} \pi \langle r^{2} \rangle = -\frac{e^2 B}{4m} \langle r^{2} \rangle$, where <r2> is the mean square projection of the orbit perpendicular to the field.
Summing over Z electrons per atom and multiplying by the number density of atoms N gives the magnetization $M = N \sum \mu_{ind} = -\frac{Ne^2 Z \langle r^{2} \rangle B}{6m}$.
Magnetic susceptibility $\chi = \frac{M}{H} = \mu_0 \frac{M}{B} (since B \approx \mu_0 H$ for weak fields) yields the final diamagnetic susceptibility expression.
Result: $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 Ne^2 Z \langle r^{2} \rangle}{6m}$
Behavior of Diamagnetic Rod in a Non-Uniform Field
Conditions: Rod of volume V and susceptibility χ suspended in magnetic field gradient
The potential energy U of a magnetic dipole of moment M in a magnetic field B is $U = -M \cdot B$.
The induced magnetic moment per unit volume is $I = \chi H \approx \frac{\chi B}{\mu_0}$.
The total induced magnetic moment is $M = V I = \frac{V \chi B}{\mu_0}$.
Substituting M into the potential energy equation yields $U = -\frac{V \chi B^2}{\mu_0}$.
The force F acting on the rod along the field gradient is $F = -\frac{dU}{ds} = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} \frac{d}{ds}(B^2)$. Since χ is negative, the force acts in the direction of decreasing magnetic field strength.
Result: $F = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{ds} (pointing towards weaker field regions)$
Formula sheet
Formula / law
Equation
Variables and units
Conditions
Magnetic Susceptibility
$$\chi = \frac{I}{H}$$
I = Intensity of magnetization, H = Magnetic field intensity Dimensionless
Valid for linear isotropic media
Relative Permeability
$$\mu_{r} = 1 + \chi$$
μr = Relative permeability, $\chi = Magnetic susceptibility$ Dimensionless
General magnetic relation
Larmor Frequency
$$\Delta\omega = \frac{eB}{2m}$$
e = Electronic charge, B = Magnetic field, m = Mass of electron rad s-1
Weak magnetic field limit
Langevin Diamagnetic Susceptibility
$$\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 Ne^2 Z \langle r^{2} \rangle}{6m}$$
N = Atomic number density, Z = Atomic number, <r2$ \rangle = Mean square radius$ Dimensionless
Classical approximation for spherical atoms
Magnetic Induction in Diamagnetic Material
$$B = \mu_0(H + I) = \mu H$$
B = Magnetic induction, H = Applied field, I = Magnetization, $\mu = Permeability$ Tesla (T)
Macroscopic Maxwell relation
Force in Non-Uniform Magnetic Field
$$F_{x} = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{dx}$$
V = Volume, $\chi = Susceptibility$, B = Magnetic field, x = Spatial coordinate Newton (N)
Non-uniform magnetic field gradient
Meissner Effect Susceptibility
$$\chi = -1$$
$\chi = Magnetic susceptibility$ Dimensionless
Perfect diamagnetism in superconductors
Curie-Weiss Law Invariance
$$\chi = \text{constant}$$
$\chi = Diamagnetic susceptibility$ Dimensionless
Independent of absolute temperature T
Graphs and experiments
Magnetization (I) vs Magnetic Field Intensity (H)
Draw: A straight line passing through the origin in the fourth quadrant, with a negative slope equal to χ.
Interpret: Shows that magnetization is directly proportional to applied field intensity but directed oppositely, resulting in negative susceptibility.
Exam use: Tested in MCQs to identify material type from I-H or M-H slope characteristics.
Susceptibility (χ) vs Temperature (T)
Draw: A horizontal straight line parallel to the temperature axis, indicating zero variation with T.
Interpret: Demonstrates the complete temperature independence of diamagnetic susceptibility.
Exam use: Differentiating diamagnetism from paramagnetism and ferromagnetism in conceptual questions.
Draw: A U-tube setup showing depression of a liquid level or apparent weight loss of a diamagnetic sample placed between pole pieces of an electromagnet.
Interpret: Measures the force exerted on a diamagnetic material in a magnetic field gradient to determine susceptibility.
Exam use: Experimental basis questions regarding measurement of magnetic susceptibility in PGT exams.
Solved numericals
TGT core
A diamagnetic substance has a magnetic susceptibility of -1.5 × 10-5. Calculate its relative permeability.
Recall the relation between relative permeability and magnetic susceptibility: μr = 1 + χ.
Substitute the given value of susceptibility: μr = 1 + (-1.5 × 10-5).
Calculate the final numerical value: μr = 1 - 0.000015 = 0.999985.
Answer: 0.999985
PGT extension
Estimate the atomic diamagnetic susceptibility of a substance given that the atomic number density $N = 5 × 10^{28} m^{-3}$, Z = 10, and mean square radius <r2$ \rangle = 1 × 10^{-20} m^{2}$. Take μ0 = 4π × 10-7 T m A-1, $e = 1.6 × 10^{-19} C$, $m = 9.1 × 10^{-31} kg$.
Use Langevin formula: $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 Ne^2 Z \langle r^{2} \rangle}{6m}$.
A small bismuth sphere of volume 10-6 m-3 and magnetic susceptibility -1.6 × 10-5 is placed in a non-uniform magnetic field where the product B(dB/dx) is 102 T2 m-1. Calculate the magnetic force acting on the sphere. (μ0 = 4π × 10-7 T m A-1)
Use the force formula for a magnetic sample in a field gradient: $F = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{dx}$.
Answer: -1.27 × 10-3 N (repulsive force away from higher field region)
Assumptions and limitations
Langevin's classical theory assumes spherically symmetric electron charge distributions and independent atomic orbits, which is an approximation for multi-electron atoms in condensed matter.
Common misconceptions
Common error: Diamagnetism is absent in paramagnetic and ferromagnetic materials.
Correct: Diamagnetism is an intrinsic property of all matter, but it is masked in paramagnetic and ferromagnetic substances because their positive paramagnetic or ferromagnetic responses are orders of magnitude larger.
All atoms contain orbiting electrons that undergo Larmor precession, but permanent atomic dipoles dominate when present.
Common error: Diamagnetic susceptibility depends strongly on temperature.
Correct: Diamagnetic susceptibility is essentially independent of temperature.
Thermal motion does not affect the induced Larmor precession currents responsible for diamagnetism.
Quick revision
Diamagnetism is universal, temperature-independent, possesses negative susceptibility (χ < 0), relative permeability slightly less than one, and causes repulsion from strong magnetic field regions.
Magnetic Susceptibility: $\chi = \frac{I}{H}$
Relative Permeability: μr = 1 + χ
Must remember
Every material possesses diamagnetism inherently due to orbiting electrons constituting microscopic current loops.
Diamagnetic susceptibility $\chi$ is small and negative, typically ranging from $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-9}$.
Relative magnetic permeability $\mu_r = 1 + \chi$ is slightly less than unity, making $\mu < \mu_0$.
Diamagnetic susceptibility is essentially independent of absolute temperature $T$.
In a non-uniform magnetic field, diamagnetic materials move from regions of stronger field to weaker field.
A freely suspended diamagnetic rod aligns itself perpendicular to the applied uniform magnetic field.
Superconductors exhibit perfect diamagnetism with $\chi = -1$, known as the Meissner effect.
Langevin's classical theory relates diamagnetic susceptibility to the mean square radius of electron orbits $\langle r^2 \rangle$.
Glossary
Magnetic Susceptibility (\chi)Ratio of intensity of magnetization $I$ to magnetic field intensity $H$, measuring the degree of magnetization of a material.
Relative Permeability (\mu_r)Ratio of the permeability of a substance to the permeability of free space, given by $\mu_r = 1 + \chi$.
Larmor Frequency (\Delta \omega)Frequency of precession of electrons around the magnetic field direction when an external field is applied, given by $\Delta \omega = \frac{eB}{2m}$.
Meissner EffectComplete expulsion of magnetic flux from the interior of a superconductor, resulting in perfect diamagnetism with $\chi = -1$.
Langevin DiamagnetismClassical theory treating diamagnetic susceptibility using atomic number density, atomic number, and mean square orbital radius.
Magnetic Properties of Diamagnetic Materials
Property
TGT Core Level
PGT Extension Level
Susceptibility (\chi)
Small and negative ($-10^{-5}$ to $-10^{-9}$)
Expressed via Langevin formula: $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 N e^2 Z \langle r^2 \rangle}{6m}$
Proof via absence of thermal disruption on induced Larmor precession currents
Behavior in Fields
Repelled from strong to weak magnetic regions
Quantitative force equation $F_x = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{dx}$
Practice Quiz
Choose an option to reveal the explanation.
1. What is the nature and approximate range of magnetic susceptibility ($\chi$) for diamagnetic materials?
Explanation: Diamagnetic materials possess a small and negative magnetic susceptibility, typically on the order of $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-9}$.
2. How does the relative magnetic permeability ($\mu_r$) of a diamagnetic substance compare to unity?
Explanation: Since $\mu_r = 1 + \chi$ and $\chi$ is small and negative, the relative permeability is slightly less than unity.
3. How does the magnetic susceptibility of a diamagnetic material vary with absolute temperature $T$?
Explanation: Unlike paramagnetism and ferromagnetism, diamagnetic susceptibility is independent of absolute temperature because thermal agitation does not disrupt the induced atomic currents.
4. When a diamagnetic rod is freely suspended in a uniform magnetic field, how does it orient itself?
Explanation: A freely suspended diamagnetic rod experiences a torque that aligns it perpendicular to the direction of a uniform magnetic field.
5. What happens to a diamagnetic material when placed in a non-uniform magnetic field?
Explanation: In a non-uniform magnetic field, diamagnetic materials are repelled from stronger magnetic fields toward weaker magnetic field regions.
6. What is the magnetic susceptibility of a superconductor exhibiting the Meissner effect?
Explanation: Superconductors exhibit perfect diamagnetism with $\chi = -1$, completely expelling all magnetic flux.
7. Which physical law accounts for the induced current in orbiting electrons opposing an external magnetic field?
Explanation: An external magnetic field induces an electromotive force via Faraday's law, and according to Lenz's law, the induced current creates a magnetic moment opposing the applied field.
8. What is the formula for Larmor frequency ($\Delta \omega$) associated with electron precession in a weak magnetic field $B$?
Explanation: The Larmor frequency shift is given by $\Delta \omega = \frac{eB}{2m}$, where $e$ is electronic charge, $B$ is the magnetic field, and $m$ is the mass of the electron.
9. In Langevin's classical theory of diamagnetism, what does the expression for susceptibility $\chi$ depend upon directly?
Explanation: Langevin's classical susceptibility is given by $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 N e^2 Z \langle r^2 \rangle}{6m}$, which depends directly on the mean square radius $\langle r^2 \rangle$ of the electron orbits.
10. Why is diamagnetism masked in paramagnetic and ferromagnetic materials?
Explanation: Diamagnetism is an intrinsic property of all matter, but it is masked because permanent atomic dipoles in paramagnetic and ferromagnetic substances create vastly larger positive responses.
11. What is the macroscopic relation connecting magnetic induction $B$, applied field $H$, and magnetization $I$ in a diamagnetic material?
Explanation: The general macroscopic Maxwell relation is $B = \mu_0(H + I) = \mu H$, valid for linear isotropic magnetic media.
12. What is the expression for the force $F_x$ experienced by a diamagnetic sample of volume $V$ in a non-uniform magnetic field along the $x$-axis?
Explanation: The force in a non-uniform magnetic field gradient is given by $F_x = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{dx}$. Since $\chi$ is negative, the force is directed toward weaker field regions.
13. Which of the following materials is classified as diamagnetic?
Explanation: Bismuth is a well-known strongly diamagnetic substance, whereas iron is ferromagnetic, aluminum is paramagnetic, and oxygen (gaseous) is paramagnetic.
14. What are the units of magnetic susceptibility ($\chi$)?
Explanation: Magnetic susceptibility $\chi = \frac{I}{H}$ is the ratio of two quantities with the same units ($A/m$), making it dimensionless.
15. Under what exceptional conditions can diamagnetic susceptibility exhibit temperature dependence?
Explanation: Normally temperature independent, exceptions occur only in certain semimetals or superconductors where structural phase changes alter carrier density with temperature.
PYQ Patterns
These are pattern-based practice questions. Authentic year labels are only used when verified from a source.
1. The magnetic susceptibility of a diamagnetic substance is:
Explanation: Diamagnetic materials have a small and negative magnetic susceptibility, typically ranging from $10^{-5}$ to $10^{-9}$.
2. Which of the following relations between relative permeability ($\mu_r$) and magnetic susceptibility ($\chi$) is correct?
Explanation: From electromagnetic theory, the relative permeability is related to magnetic susceptibility by $\mu_r = 1 + \chi$.
3. Diamagnetism is strictly a property of:
Explanation: Every material possesses diamagnetism because all atoms contain orbiting electrons that constitute microscopic current loops.
4. How does the magnetic permeability $\mu$ of a diamagnetic material compare with the permeability of free space $\mu_0$?
Explanation: Since $\chi$ is negative, $\mu_r = 1 + \chi < 1$, which implies $\mu < \mu_0$.
5. The phenomenon of perfect diamagnetism in superconductors is known as:
Explanation: The Meissner effect describes perfect diamagnetism in superconductors where all magnetic flux is completely expelled, with $\chi = -1$.
6. According to Langevin's theory, the diamagnetic susceptibility is proportional to which atomic parameter?
Explanation: Langevin's susceptibility expression $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 N e^2 Z \langle r^2 \rangle}{6m}$ shows direct proportionality to the mean square radius $\langle r^2 \rangle$.
Timed Topic Test
Attempt these questions under a ten-minute limit using a separate timer.
1. What is the primary physical origin of diamagnetism in atoms?
Explanation: Diamagnetism originates from the induced electromotive force on orbiting electrons that creates microscopic current loops opposing the applied field.
2. If a diamagnetic material has a magnetic susceptibility of $-2 \times 10^{-5}$, what is its relative permeability?
Explanation: Using $\mu_r = 1 + \chi$, we get $\mu_r = 1 + (-2 \times 10^{-5}) = 1 - 0.00002 = 0.99998$.
3. Why is diamagnetic susceptibility independent of absolute temperature?
Explanation: Thermal agitation does not disrupt induced atomic currents because diamagnetism arises from dynamic response (Larmor precession) rather than dipole orientation.
4. A diamagnetic rod is placed inside a non-uniform magnetic field. Where will it tend to position itself?
Explanation: Due to negative susceptibility, diamagnetic materials experience a repulsive force pushing them from stronger to weaker magnetic field regions.
5. What is the Larmor frequency shift for an electron of mass $m$ and charge $e$ in a magnetic field $B$?
Explanation: The Larmor frequency shift is $\Delta \omega = \frac{eB}{2m}$ under weak magnetic field limits.
6. Which of the following statements is correct regarding magnetic permeability ($\mu$) of diamagnetic substances?
Explanation: Since $\mu_r < 1$, the permeability $\mu = \mu_0 \mu_r$ is strictly less than the permeability of free space $\mu_0$.
7. In Langevin's classical formula for diamagnetic susceptibility, what does $Z$ represent?
Explanation: In the formula $\chi = -\frac{\mu_0 N e^2 Z \langle r^2 \rangle}{6m}$, $Z$ denotes the atomic number of the atoms.
8. What characterizes the magnetic state of a superconductor in terms of magnetic induction $B$ inside its bulk?
Explanation: In a superconductor (Meissner effect), magnetic flux is completely expelled from the interior, meaning magnetic induction $B = 0$.
9. Why does diamagnetism exist in all substances without exception?
Explanation: Because all atoms contain orbiting electrons, every material possesses microscopic current loops capable of exhibiting diamagnetic response.
10. If the volume of a diamagnetic sample is $2 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m}^3$, susceptibility is $-10^{-5}$, applied field $H = 10^4 \text{ A/m}$, and magnetic field gradient $\frac{dB}{dx} = 2 \text{ T/m}$ with $\mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7}$, what is the nature of the force?
Explanation: The force equation $F_x = \frac{V \chi}{\mu_0} B \frac{dB}{dx}$ contains a negative $\chi$, resulting in a repulsive force pushing the sample toward the weaker field region.