The converse of “If n is divisible by 12, then n is divisible by 3” is:
If n is divisible by 3, then it is divisible by 12
If n is not divisible by 12, then it is divisible by 3
Every integer is divisible by 12
If n is divisible by 12, then it is not divisible by 3
Show step-wise answer
(a) If n is divisible by 3, then it is divisible by 12
A converse swaps the hypothesis and conclusion.
The swapped statement is false: n = 3 is a counterexample.
Practice
Truth and propositions · 3 practice marks
Question 2
For each sentence decide whether it is a proposition: (i) 7 is prime, (ii) Draw a triangle, (iii) 9 is prime. Explain why truth and proposition status differ.
Show step-wise answer
(i) True proposition; (ii) not a proposition; (iii) false proposition.
A proposition is a declarative statement with a definite truth value.
7 is prime is true; 9 is prime is false because 9 = 3 × 3.
An instruction such as Draw a triangle does not assert a true-or-false fact. A proposition need not be true.
Challenge
A false converse · 4 practice marks
Question 3
Prove that if an integer is divisible by 18 then it is divisible by both 3 and 6. Write the converse and refute it. What single divisibility condition characterises divisibility by both 3 and 6?
Show step-wise answer
The converse is false; being divisible by 6 characterises divisibility by both 3 and 6.
Write n = 18k = 3(6k) = 6(3k) to prove the implication.
Converse: if n is divisible by 3 and 6, then n is divisible by 18.
n = 6 satisfies the hypothesis but is not divisible by 18.
Every multiple of 6 is a multiple of 3. Thus “divisible by 3 and 6” is equivalent to “divisible by 6”, not by 18.
Necessary and sufficient · 4 practice marks
Question 4
For real x and y, determine whether x = y is necessary, sufficient, or both for x² = y². How does requiring x and y to be non-negative change the answer?
Show step-wise answer
Over all reals, sufficient but not necessary; over non-negative reals, both.
Equality x = y permits squaring both sides, so it is sufficient.
x = 2, y = −2 have equal squares but unequal values, disproving necessity over all reals.
Factor x² − y² = (x − y)(x + y). Equal squares give x = y or x = −y.
If both numbers are non-negative, the second possibility forces both to be zero. In this domain equal squares imply equal numbers.
Converse guided by a counterexample · 4 practice marks
Question 5
A learner claims “Equal diagonals imply a parallelogram.” Give a counterexample and add a condition that makes the conclusion valid.
Show step-wise answer
An isosceles trapezium is a counterexample; diagonals bisecting each other is sufficient.
Take A(−2,0), B(2,0), C(1,2), D(−1,2). AC and BD each have length √13.
AB and CD are parallel but AD and BC are not, so it is not a parallelogram.
If the diagonals bisect each other, the parallelogram converse theorem applies.
This bisection condition, not merely equal lengths, provides the required sufficient condition.